tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19316735.post114281216670299235..comments2023-03-24T07:41:26.436-05:00Comments on Urban Agrarian: Dewclaws - Yes or NoUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19316735.post-1147314742047510212006-05-10T21:32:00.000-05:002006-05-10T21:32:00.000-05:00What an ADORABLE dog you have!!What an ADORABLE dog you have!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19316735.post-1142985713050307612006-03-21T19:01:00.000-05:002006-03-21T19:01:00.000-05:00If the dew claws are functional, have bone, muscle...If the dew claws are functional, have bone, muscle, etc, like Kahlil's and the rest of our dog's front dew claws then I would agree with you and definitely <B>not</B> remove them. After all, as you noted, they use them. Cutting off the dew claw is like cutting off our thumbs. Nasty. I have never removed dew claws.Walter Jeffrieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12720110642967540506noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19316735.post-1142873109785062862006-03-20T11:45:00.000-05:002006-03-20T11:45:00.000-05:00Our Briard has double dewclaws on his back feet. ...Our Briard has double dewclaws on his back feet. He has single dewclaws on the front. This is typical of the breed, but atypical of dogs in general. He uses his paws like a cat does. He holds objects, "traps" them beneath his paw and then lifts to see if he got it. The only time he's ever had a dewclaw injury was when we got him shaved for summer (we'd let him get hopelessly matted) and theyLesliehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06173202724588547447noreply@blogger.com